Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To compare the ease of cervical entry after administration of vaginal misoprostol at 2 different intervals before vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded study, 140 women undergoing vaginoscopic hysteroscopy were allocated into two groups: 1) short-interval: placebo tablet administered vaginally 12 hours before the procedure, followed by 200 mcg vaginal misoprostol 3 hours before, and 2) long-interval: 200 mcg vaginal misoprostol 12 hours before the procedure and a placebo tablet 3 hours before. The primary outcome was the ease of cervical entry, evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, and the secondary outcomes included 1) time interval to cervical entry and completion of the procedure, 2) pain assessment using a visual analog scale (VAS), and 3) any adverse effects associated with the drug or procedure. Results: All except two patients with cervical stenosis underwent vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. The proportion of patients who reported "easy" or "very-easy" cervical entry was similar in both groups (64.3% [95% confidence interval [CI], 53.1-75.5%], vs. 72.9% [95% CI, 62.4-83.3%]; P=0.275). Pain perception was lower in the long-interval group than in the short-interval group (P=0.024). However, the temporal change in the pain score was not significantly different between the groups. The side effects of misoprostol were mild, self-limiting, and similar in both groups. Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol administration 12 hours before vaginoscopic hysteroscopy was associated with a similar ease of entry but a lower perception of pain using the VAS than misoprostol administration 3 hours before the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thippeswamy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: