Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Personnel-scheduling research has addressed duty rosters, staffing levels, and academic workload allocation, but the allocation of instructors to tiered instructional roles within recurring safety-training programs remains underexplored, particularly where workload equity must hold among personnel of comparable qualification rather than across the pool as a whole. This study formulates fire-safety training instructor allocation as a mixed-integer programme. The objective minimises the sum of within-tier teaching-hour ranges, subject to asymmetric role eligibility, per-slot coverage requirements, assignment exclusivity, and designated-day gender-representation and leadership-presence obligations, together with a secondary term that consolidates assignments into fewer instructor-days. The model is applied to a 15-day municipal training programme in Taiwan involving 30 instructors across three tiers and solved using LINGO 17.0. Relative to the archived manual schedule, the sum of within-tier ranges falls from 50 to 2 h and planning time from approximately 7200 to 100 s; within the junior tier, Jain's fairness index rises from 0.575 to 0.988. Sensitivity analyses across tier composition, policy-group size, and the consolidation coefficient identify a feasibility boundary at three senior instructors. The findings support fairness-oriented optimisation as a decision-support approach for municipal fire-safety training, subject to local recalibration and further validation under dynamic availability and explicit fatigue constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: