Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between binocular uncorrected visual acuity (UVA) at different distances and patient-reported difficulty with individual VF-14 activities after implantation of simultaneous vision intraocular lenses (SVIOLs). SETTING: ("Masked by journal requirement"). DESIGN: Retrospective observational. METHODS: Twelve-month data from 276 subjects implanted with either a Full-DOFi Smooth or a Partial-DOFi Extended IOL were included in the analysis. Visual acuities were obtained for far (UDVA, 4 m), intermediate (UIVA, 66 cm), and near (UNVA, 40 cm) distances, along with responses to a validated Spanish version of the VF-14 administered without spectacles. VF-14 responses were dichotomized (little/no vs other), and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine their associations with UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA. Statistical cut-off values were explored using the Youden index. RESULTS: UDVA was significantly associated with "traffic signs" and "night driving" (p < 0.05), whereas "watching TV" showed p = 0.06. UNVA was significantly associated with "knitting" (p < 0.05), whereas "large print" showed p = 0.06, and UIVA was associated with "newspapers" (p = 0.02). "Small print" and "knitting" were associated with both UIVA and UNVA, whereas "filling out forms" was associated only with UNVA (p < 0.05). Visual acuities were not associated with the remaining VF-14 items. Exploratory cut-off values maximizing the Youden index were generally 0.1 logMAR, except for "large print" (0.3 logMAR) and "traffic signs" (0.2 logMAR). CONCLUSIONS: Only some VF-14 items were associated with binocular UVA. These findings may inform the development of PRO instruments for evaluating functional differences among SVIOLs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: