Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the perceived effects of farmer-herder conflicts on the livelihoods of farming households in Oyo State, Nigeria. A multistage sampling procedure was used to select 280 respondents comprising 152 crop farmers and 128 herders. Primary data were collected using a structured interview schedule. Descriptive statistics were used to describe causes of farmer-herder conflicts, effects of farmer-herder conflicts on the livelihoods of farming households, and mitigation measures for resolution of farmer-herder conflicts. Pearson Product-Moment Correlation (r), regression coefficient (β) and t-test analyses were employed to test the study hypotheses. Economic effects of farmer-herder conflicts ranked highest among farmers (Weighted Mean Score, WMS = 4.69) and herders (WMS= 4.05). The major effects on livelihoods included reduced crop and livestock production (β = -0.652), and increased production costs (β = -0.365). Significant relationships existed between selected socioeconomic characteristics and the perceived effects of farmer-herder conflicts on livelihoods, including age (farmers: r = - 0.712, p = 0.021; herders: r = -0.613, p = 0.032), years of formal education (farmers: r = -0.693, p = 0.023; herders: r = -0.440, p = 0.028). Crop farmers reported significantly greater perceived livelihood effects than herders (t = 8.15, p < 0.05). The study concludes that persistent farmer-herder conflicts undermine sustainable agricultural production and livelihood resilience. The study recommends the promotion of ranching systems and strengthened conflict-resolution mechanisms to enhance agricultural production and improve the resilience of farming households in Oyo State, Nigeria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ademuyiwa Adetona (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: