Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper investigates the determinants of household demand for flood insurance in four European countries with high flood exposure: Poland, the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain. Using primary data collected from 1,494 households located in the flood-prone areas, the analysis examines ten potential factors influencing insurance purchase. Three hypotheses are tested: 1) The factors that most strongly influence the willingness to buy flood insurance differ between countries; 2) Insured people are guided by different factors than uninsured people; 3) People assessing the flood risk as higher are guided by different factors than people assessing the flood risk as lower. Hypothesis 1 is confirmed: significant cross-country differences exist for eight of the ten factors. In Poland and the Netherlands, respondents discriminate more strongly among factors than in Germany and Spain. Logistic regression reveals pronounced country-specific patterns: in Poland five factors are significant predictors of current insurance ownership (potential inaffordability of losses, firsthand observation of flood damage, peer insistence, premium level, and state subsidies); in the Netherlands only perceived flood probability; in Germany only persuasion by family/friends/neighbors; and in Spain only the prospect of abolished state aid after floods. Hypothesis 2 is supported overall and within most countries: insured households assign higher importance to risk-related and experiential factors, whereas uninsured households emphasize the cost-related aspects. Hypothesis 3 is also confirmed: respondents perceiving high subjective flood risk prioritise perceived probability and firsthand damage observation, while those perceiving low-to-medium risk focus on potential unaffordability of losses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: