Key result
A 48-h midodrine protocol did not reduce 24-h post-operative hypotension, but increased bradycardia in the PACU (55.9% vs 43.8%, p=0.001) and at 24 h (53.8% vs 40.7%, p=0.003).
Why the study?
Post-operative hypotension is a common complication associated with morbidity and mortality, prompting growing interest in oral midodrine to increase blood pressure. The efficacy of an institutional 48-h midodrine protocol in reducing perioperative hypotension after elective lower limb arthroplasty and emergency hip fracture fixation required evaluation.
Does a 48-h oral midodrine protocol reduce the incidence and severity of perioperative hypotension within the first 24 h following surgery in patients undergoing elective lower limb arthroplasty and emergency hip fracture fixation?
Cohort (n=626)
No
Does a 48-h oral midodrine protocol reduce the incidence and severity of perioperative hypotension within the first 24 h following surgery in patients undergoing elective lower limb arthroplasty and emergency hip fracture fixation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A 48-hour post-operative midodrine protocol did not reduce the incidence of perioperative hypotension in lower limb arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery patients, but significantly increased the rate of post-operative bradycardia.
Hypotension is a common post-operative complication that is associated with morbidity and mortality. There has been growing interest in the use of midodrine (oral alpha-1 adrenergic vasopressor agent) to increase systolic and mean arterial blood pressure in a variety of clinical applications. Our institution developed a 48-h midodrine protocol in 2020 for patients undergoing elective lower limb arthroplasty and emergency hip fracture fixation. The aim of this retrospective, single-centre metropolitan tertiary hospital cohort study was to evaluate the efficacy of the protocol in reducing the incidence and severity of perioperative hypotension (SBP <110 mmHg) within the first 24 h following surgery compared to the pre-protocol period (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included frequency of hypotension 24–48 h post-operatively, bradycardia, incidence of MET calls and unplanned critical care admission. In total, 328 patients were identified for inclusion in the pre-protocol group and 298 in the protocol group. Introduction of the midodrine protocol was not associated with a significant difference in the incidence of the primary outcome. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between groups post-operatively at 24 or 48 h. Of the secondary outcomes, patients receiving midodrine were more likely to be bradycardic in the post-anaesthesia care unit (43.8% vs 55.9%, p = 0.001) and at 24 h post-operatively (40.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.003).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Powell et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Perioperative hypotension following lower limb arthroplasty and emergency hip fracture surgery (n=626). Midodrine protocol vs. Pre-protocol period (no midodrine protocol) was evaluated on Incidence and severity of perioperative hypotension (SBP <110 mmHg) within the first 24 h following surgery. A 48-h midodrine protocol did not reduce 24-h post-operative hypotension, but increased bradycardia in the PACU (55.9% vs 43.8%, p=0.001) and at 24 h (53.8% vs 40.7%, p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: