Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of the present systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of Core Strength Training (CST) on physical performance outcomes specifically in team-sport athletes. A systematic search was conducted across Web of Sciences (all databases), Scopus, PubMed, and SportDiscus up to January 2025. Thirty-four studies (1,006 participants) were included, of which 21 (n = 643) were integrated into the meta-analysis. CST produced significant improvements in strength (SMD = 0.52), speed (SMD = –0.54), change of direction (COD) (SMD = –0.52), power (SMD = 0.43), balance (SMD = 0.83), athletic performance 1 (AP 1 ) (SMD = 0.61), and athletic performance 2 (AP 2 ) (SMD = –2.66). Subgroup analyses revealed that males improved across all outcomes, while females showed improvements primarily in strength and power. Non-elite athletes benefited across all variables, whereas elite athletes improved in strength, speed, power, balance, and AP 1 . Adults improved across most outcomes, adolescents improved in strength, speed, power, balance, and AP 1 , and children improved only in strength. Moderator analyses indicated that programmes lasting ≤8 weeks improved all outcomes except AP 1 , while >8-week programmes improved only strength and speed. Training frequencies of ≤2 days/week improved most outcomes except COD and AP 1 , whereas 3 days/week improved all outcomes except AP 2 . CST meaningfully enhances multiple physical performance outcomes in team-sport athletes. The largest benefits were observed in males, non-elite athletes, and adults, with more modest improvements in females, adolescents, and children. Programmes lasting ≤8 weeks and delivered 2–3 times per week appear to be the most effective configuration for improving performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: