Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Handedness literacy, a term coined here to refer to one’s knowledge about and understanding of handedness, is an understudied yet crucial component of educational neuroscience. It is distinct from attitudes toward left-handers, but it can inform the practical and psychosocial support teachers provide to their left-handed students, thereby promoting better classroom ergonomics and reducing stigma. This study investigated teachers’ handedness literacy for the first time, focusing on educators from Greece (n = 273), Serbia (n = 365), and Belgium (n = 213). Qualitative responses from Greek and Serbian educators differed in emphasis (neurobiological versus practical), but generally revealed supportive attitudes towards left-handers. Quantitative analysis from all three countries highlighted factual misunderstandings, with many educators incorrectly associating left-handedness with increased intelligence, or expressing substantial uncertainty about whether left-handedness is a feature of autism and dyslexia. Contrary to our hypothesis, left-handed educators did not demonstrate superior handedness literacy compared to their right-handed counterparts. Additionally, teachers across countries consistently overestimated the proportion of left-handers in the population, possibly conflating left-handedness with general non-right-handedness. Most teachers further acknowledged the need for improved handedness literacy. Findings underline the critical importance of integrating formal training about handedness into teacher education and professional development programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Παπαδάτου-Παστού et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: