Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Given the potential environmental and health risks posed by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, we use CF 4 as a model compound to investigate the trends in C–F bond activation. Using density functional theory calculations and machine learning, we examined three distinct catalyst systems: transition metal (TM) surfaces, single-atom alloys (SAAs), and SiC-supported single-atom catalysts (SACs). On TM surfaces, both activation energy (Ea) versus the reaction energy (ΔE) and Ea versus the fluorine binding energy (BE(F)) exhibit well-defined linear relationships, which are strongly governed by the coordination environment. On SAAs, where a single TM atom is embedded in a host lattice with considerable site heterogeneity, the Ea~ΔE correlation follows a volcano-shaped trend. In contrast, on SACs, which feature lower coordination numbers, both the Ea~ΔE and Ea ~ BE(F) correlations adopt volcano-type curves. For SAAs, a convolutional neural network (CNN) model was developed to predict BE(F) directly from the density of states. Combining the CNN-predicted BE(F) with the SAA-specific Ea ~ BE(F) scaling relation enables efficient estimation of C-F activation energies within this catalyst class. This descriptor-based machine-learning strategy provides a transferable workflow that can be extended to other catalyst classes using system-specific training data and scaling relations. Overall, this work provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and predicting C–F bond activation in CF 4 over different catalysts, paving the way for the rational design of efficient catalysts for perfluorocarbon decomposition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: