Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A single rolling friction coefficient in discrete element method (DEM) simulations cannot represent differences in rolling resistance among morphology-based peanut seed classes. After shelling, Silihong peanut seeds were classified as upper, middle, or lower based on seed-shape features associated with compression by neighboring seeds. Physical and contact properties were measured, and multi-sphere models were constructed using class-specific geometries and a common geometry based on dimensions weighted by a prescribed 1:2:1 seed-number ratio. Calibration against the measured static angle of repose of 22.280° yielded a baseline seed–seed rolling friction coefficient of 0.02552; rerunning the simulation with this coefficient reproduced the calibration target with a relative error of 0.485%. Shape corrections derived from aspect ratios and single-seed critical angles were 1.1046, 0.9687, and 0.9579, giving class-specific coefficients of 0.02819, 0.02472, and 0.02445 while preserving their weighted mean. At a drum speed of 15 r/min, the three particle models produced similar overall dynamic angles of repose. Coupled simulations yielded qualified, multiple, and missed seeding indices of 92.2%, 6.7%, and 1.1%, respectively, close to the bench-test values; all three mean indices met the cited technical requirements. The parameter set and calibration procedure provide a case-specific reference for the tested Silihong seed batch, particle representation, moisture content, and metering conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: