Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study adaptive edge discovery in a known finite bipartite graph whose edges are independently present with probability 1/2. Queries are charged at both endpoints, successful edges may be retained without commitment, and the objective is expected matching size relative to the expected full-information optimum.First, the established optimistic maximum-matching-round policy, run for R rounds, has expected relative loss at most 2 log(3)/(R log(3/2)). It therefore obtains a (1-epsilon) approximation with a hard per-vertex query cap ceil(6/epsilon) on every finite input. The proof tracks evolving vertex covers indexed by subsets of one minimum cover of the host graph.Second, on an explicit family with accuracy parameter epsilon_N, mandatory optimistic matching batches need Omega(1/(epsilon_N log^2(1/epsilon_N))) queries at some vertex, whereas interior-first screening achieves the same expected accuracy with O(log(1/epsilon_N)) queries per vertex. The screening policy uses optimistic maximum-matching proposals but cancels a proposal after a negative answer. Thus within-proposal stopping can change endpoint query cost exponentially on this family.The algorithm and construction precedents are attributed in the manuscript. The paper does not establish a universal logarithmic query guarantee or make empirical relationship-prediction claims. Complete proofs and a vector schematic are included. This is an AI-assisted preprint, not a peer-reviewed publication; OpenAI Codex assisted with mathematical derivation, drafting, and internal proof review. No empirical dataset or simulations are used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maximilian Kornstein (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: