Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prediction-based min-entropy estimators often assume that one target-bit setting is suitable for sources with different marginal and temporal structures. We present MATE, a target-bit-aware dual-view framework that combines temporal features with synchronized Gramian Angular Field, Markov Transition Field, and Recurrence Plot representations. MATE profiles target-bit settings from 1 to 16 and evaluates whether the resulting operating points remain stable after compression. Experiments on 18 sources spanning distribution-based, generalized binary autoregressive (gbAR), and deterministic families show a clear source-dependent pattern: all four gbAR sources and all ten M^* M ∗ -sequence sources achieve their lowest profiled errors at 1 bit, whereas the distribution-based sources prefer settings between 9 and 12 bits. The mean best-profiled error is 0.074395, compared with 0.647652 at the fixed 8-bit setting. Pruning, 2-bit quantization, and their combination preserve the empirically preferred target-bit setting for all 18 sources. In the shared-stream evaluation under the controlled fixed-8-bit protocol, Full MATE attains a macro mean absolute error of 1.904 bits per symbol, numerically close to 1.910 for NIST SP 800-90B and lower than 3.197 for TPA-LSTM, although none of the prespecified source-level comparisons is significant after Holm correction. Under strict budget matching, HP-UJ has a slightly lower numerical macro error than MA-Joint, but the paired difference is not significant after Holm adjustment. Deployment results show substantial storage reduction and lower incremental CPU memory, but no consistent CPU/GPU acceleration or GPU-memory reduction. Overall, the empirically preferred target-bit granularity varies across the evaluated sources, and the profiled operating points remain stable under compression, while budget-matched accuracy and runtime efficiency require separate evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: