Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To evaluate how field-applied imbibition agents affect oil recovery and pore-scale oil mobilization in Chang 8 tight sandstone, natural cores from Longdong, Ordos Basin, were tested using CNI-A, CQH-1, and EOS-3. Surface tension, oil–water interfacial tension, and contact angle were measured at different concentrations. Solutions with a mass fraction of 0.3% were selected for 144 h macroscopic imbibition tests and 96 h nuclear magnetic resonance measurements at 18 MPa. All three agents reduced surface and oil–water interfacial tension and altered core wettability. At a mass fraction of 0.3%, EOS-3 achieved the lowest oil–water interfacial tension (0.03 mN/m), whereas CQH-1 produced the highest average recovery after 144 h (32.9%), compared with 21.9% for CNI-A and 20.6% for EOS-3. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation-time distributions indicated oil mobilization across different pore populations and supported the stronger sustained performance of CQH-1. This contrast shows that interfacial tension alone cannot determine imbibition performance. In the field trial, Well X treated with CQH-1 showed a 28.4% increase in average daily oil production during the first month and a 23.1% increase in cumulative oil production over 90 days. Imbibition performance reflects the combined effects of wettability alteration, capillary driving force, interfacial resistance, and pore-throat structure. This study provides an experimental basis for selecting imbibition agents for Chang 8 tight sandstone reservoirs in Longdong.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: