Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract zbMATH Open is a leading curated bibliographic database covering approximately five million publications in mathematics. This paper presents Marebito, a production citation-matching system developed for zbMATH Open, and documents its architecture, domain-adapted feature design, and operational performance at scale. Marebito combines bibliographic parsing with GROBID, candidate retrieval with Elasticsearch, and a supervised Random Forest trained on domain-specific string-similarity features. Evaluation on internal zbMATH Open datasets yields precision and recall exceeding 98% on modern DOI-indexed records. Evaluation across two bibliographically distinct subsets reveals that classifier performance is strongly conditioned on metadata completeness, particularly title and author string quality, rather than DOI availability alone, documenting a concrete challenge for citation matching in mathematical literature. A preliminary comparison with Crossref on a manually verified subset of 2,037 entries illustrates the limitations of general-purpose matchers on specialist mathematical bibliography. A neural reranking baseline confirms that Elasticsearch-derived hard negatives are essential for abstention. We also discuss downstream bibliometric applications within zbMATH Open.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deb et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: