Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction The horse-rider relationship is increasingly recognized as a determinant of psychological well-being in equestrian riders, yet validated instruments remain scarce outside English-speaking contexts. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Horse-Rider Relationship Scale (HRRS) and its associations with mental well-being in Hungarian female equestrian riders. Material and methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to 160 female equestrian riders in Hungary. Participants completed the HRRS—measuring compatibility, communication, respect, trust, and self-confidence—and the Sport Mental Health Continuum Short Form. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Pearson correlations were conducted; group differences by horse ownership were also examined. Results The CFA confirmed the five-factor structure with acceptable fit (CFI = .974, TLI = .962, RMSEA = .059, SRMR = .037). Horse ownership was not associated with any HRRS dimension. All five relationship dimensions yielded significant positive correlations with emotional, psychological, and social well-being, with the strongest associations found for self-confidence (r = 0.495) and communication (r = 0.485) with psychological well-being. Conclusions The HRRS demonstrates sound psychometric properties in a Hungarian female equestrian sample. Relationship quality—rather than horse ownership—is associated with greater mental well-being, underscoring the importance of fostering the horse-rider bond in both sport and therapeutic equestrian contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selmeci et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: