Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical characteristics and 1-year outcomes of glaucoma surgery-associated bullous keratopathy (BK), comparing eyes with prior incisional glaucoma surgery (IGS-BK) and laser iridotomy (LI-BK), using data from the Japanese National Survey on Corneal Transplantation. METHODS: Among 1941 BK eyes, 404 IGS-BK and 353 LI-BK eyes were analyzed. Clinical parameters and 1-year graft clarity were compared. Within IGS-BK, glaucoma subtypes were examined. Univariate (n = 382) and multivariable (n = 371, excluding cytomegalovirus and pediatric glaucoma) logistic regression identified predictors of graft failure. RESULTS: IGS-BK patients were younger (72.8 vs. 77.2 years, P <0.001) and predominantly male (64.6% vs. 18.4%). Primary open-angle/normal-tension glaucoma (34.7%) and exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) (30.0%) were most common. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was the predominant procedure (81.7% IGS-BK; 78.2% LI-BK). One-year graft clarity was lower in IGS-BK (82.2% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.002), with XFG showing the poorest outcomes (73.0%). Univariate analysis identified male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.83, P = 0.046], younger age (OR = 0.75 per 10-year increase, P = 0.008), and XFG (OR = 2.63, P = 0.004) as predictors of graft failure. After multivariable adjustment, XFG remained an independent risk factor (OR = 3.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-5.99, P = 0.002), as did younger age (OR = 0.72, P = 0.019). Complication profiles differed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: XFG independently predicts poor outcomes in IGS-BK, underscoring the importance of glaucoma subtype stratification. Patients with XFG require intensified perioperative management and postoperative monitoring to optimize graft survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: