Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. Earlier identification of pregnancies at risk could inform antenatal surveillance. We aimed to develop and externally test a deep learning model for predicting SGA birth using routine fetal ultrasound images acquired at 20–23 weeks of gestation. Methods This two-center retrospective study used case-enriched samples comprising 594 pregnancies (306 SGA; 2,970 images) at Center A and 407 pregnancies (164 SGA; 2,035 images) at Center B. SGA was defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age and sex. Model development and five-fold cross-validation used Center A images, followed by evaluation on a held-out internal test set. Center B provided independent external testing without model updating. The model incorporated split-group convolution, channel attention, and multi-scale feature fusion. Performance was evaluated at the image level and compared with established deep learning architectures. Ablation analyses and gradient-weighted class activation mapping were also performed. Results Comparative and ablation experiments supported the contribution of the proposed modules. In the held-out internal image test set, the proposed model achieved an AUC of 0.8667, an F1-score of 0.8006, an MCC of 0.5820, and an accuracy of 0.7912. In the independent external image test set, it achieved an AUC of 0.8046, an F1-score of 0.7132, an MCC of 0.4845, and an accuracy of 0.7273. Conclusions The model showed image-level discrimination of subsequent SGA birth using routine mid-trimester ultrasound images in internal and independent external testing. Patient-level validation and assessment of calibration and clinical utility are needed before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: