Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the security-related, institutional, and technological conditions under which Türkiye’s UAV/UCAV capacity developed and assesses its implications for security policy and international positioning. Designed as a qualitative explanatory case study, the research analyzes a purposively selected corpus of 43 academic, institutional, and open-source documents through five themes: security pressure, institutional coordination, domestic production, operational learning, and international visibility. The Turkish model is positioned through a criteria-based comparison with the United States, Israel, and Iran without ranking national capabilities. The findings show that the transformation cannot be explained solely by technical modernization. Security pressure, public-private coordination, battlefield learning, and gradual dependency reduction jointly shaped the capacity. The article therefore conceptualizes Türkiye’s experience as a middle-power military innovation pathway that produces limited but strategically consequential autonomy in selected domains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özbay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: