Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conversational artificial intelligence platforms and automated psychological screening agents are increasingly deployed to alleviate catastrophic shortages of mental healthcare professionals in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs). However, prevailing safety mechanisms and clinical natural language processing (NLP) classifiers remain almost exclusively calibrated on explicit, overt disclosures of crisis, creating a severe diagnostic blindspot when confronted with subtle, veiled, or metaphorical suicidal ideation. In this paper, we establish a comprehensive empirical benchmark evaluating open-weight Large Language Models (LLMs)—specifically Meta Llama-3-8B-Instruct and Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct—against domain-specific discriminative encoders (Mental-RoBERTa) and commercial frontier anchors (GPT-4o) across the standardized 6-stage clinical continuum of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Utilizing the psychologically simulated DeepSuiMind corpus paired with the UMD Reddit Suicidality overt control distribution, we uncover a devastating "implicit gap": under standard zero-shot prompting, open-weight foundation models suffer an average 61.5% relative collapse in Macro-F1 and exhibit an alarming 22.9% High-Risk False Negative Rate, routinely misclassifying imminent suicide preparations as benign stress or passive sorrow. To resolve this life-threatening deficiency on consumer-grade hardware, we introduce a structured Clinical Few-Shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting framework and a 4-bit Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (QLoRA) pipeline. Our empirical profiling across 5 random seeds demonstrates that Clinical Few-Shot CoT completely eliminates high-risk triage omissions (0.0% High-Risk FNR), restoring Macro-F1 to 0.899 (±0.053), Quadratic Weighted Kappa to 0.985 (±0.008), and stage Mean Absolute Error to 0.09, matching or surpassing commercial proprietary systems. All code, prompts, trial logs, and benchmark datasets are released as an open-source clinical auditing suite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salman Nawaz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: