Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in patients in a large health system serving a predominantly rural population. DESIGN: Multi-center, quasi-experimental, before-after study. SETTING: 21 hospitals (including academic, community, and critical access) in a decentralized Appalachian healthcare system. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: During August and September of 2023, we implemented daily CHG bathing for all patients (of at least two months of age) who had central lines and/or were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: bloodstream infection (MRSA-BSI), in the 18 months before and after the intervention, excluding a 2-month rollout period. We modeled the standardized infection ratio (SIR) using negative binomial generalized linear mixed effects models, incorporating each hospital's risk-adjusted predicted number of infections (from NHSN). RESULTS: After implementation of daily CHG bathing, we observed significant reductions in bloodstream infections, with a 35% reduction in CLABSIs (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.650; 95% CI: 0.502-0.841) and a 40% reduction in MRSA bacteremia (IRR 0.599; 95% CI 0.408-0.880). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of daily CHG bathing for high-risk patients across a decentralized, Appalachian healthcare system was associated with reductions in CLABSI as well as MRSA bacteremia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ratliff et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: