Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging trend risk for health insurers. This paper develops a multi-year actuarial framework of the kind used in an own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) to assess how an unpriced AMR trend affects capital adequacy and how a potential new antimicrobial agent would change it. Resistance prevalence follows a logit random walk, claim numbers are mixed Poisson, premiums are repriced with a one-year lag, and solvency is measured by the first passage of own funds below a stylized 99.5% capital benchmark, distinguished from classical ruin. A patent-informed candidate compound serves only as a secondary illustration; its in vitro activity sets one scenario parameter. We derive the expected cost and break-even price under two payment arrangements, the conditional and predictive variance of annual claims, and the repricing-lag loss. In a hypothetical portfolio, the 15-year breach probability is 0.332 without the agent and 0.279 conditional on its success, equivalent to an additional capital buffer of about 7% of the requirement; with a market-entry probability of 0.03, the effect is negligible. About two-fifths of the benefit disappears when premiums anticipate the trend, so the agent acts largely as a hedge against unpriced trend risk. All portfolio parameters are hypothetical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: