Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study testing acyclicity of directed graphs in the bounded-degree incidence-lists model, where a tester can query the outneighbors of a vertex but not its inneighbors. Despite significant effort, no tester with $o(n)$ queries is known, while the best established lower bounds are Ω(n5/9) for one-sided testers (Chen, Randolph, Servedio, and Sun, 2022) and Ω(n1/3) for two-sided testers (Bender and Ron, 2002). We show that a query exponent arbitrarily close to one is necessary: for every fixed η∈(0,1), there exists a constant ε_η>0 such that, for every constant d≥2, every randomized adaptive two-sided ε_η-tester for acyclicity of simple n-vertex directed graphs whose indegrees and outdegrees are at most d makes Ω(n1-η) queries. Our proof overcomes two barriers. First, in previous constructions, the acyclic part of the graph is easy to recognize, which helps an algorithm stay inside the cyclic part. We hide a high-girth cyclic core inside a hierarchy of acyclic masking regions, in which each region imitates the levels below it and can be told apart from them only through rare events, and an iterated information-theoretic argument shows that every exploration observes only small, low-diameter forest components of the core. Second, a two-sided tester may exploit the statistics of collisions without ever seeing a cycle, and at a near-linear budget collisions are unavoidable. We compare complete transcripts with those of an acyclic input built on a fixed core by counting injective embeddings of the observed forest: in high-girth cores, all connected collision patterns of bounded order contribute identically, which makes the two transcript distributions statistically indistinguishable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Czumaj et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: