Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cropland expansion in arid oases can increase pressure on limited water resources. However, conventional land-cover analyses cannot show whether newly cultivated land develops an irrigation-associated surface response or whether the expansion takes place under strong water constraints. Here, we developed a multisource remote-sensing framework to diagnose the water-resource pressure associated with cropland expansion in Xinjiang, China, from 2015 to 2024. We first used annual cropland trajectories to identify persistent new cropland. We then combined Landsat-derived changes in the oasis cooling effect (OCE) with post-conversion cropland persistence to construct an Irrigation-related Diagnostic Index (IDI), and we evaluated its spatial consistency with the independent IrriMap_CN irrigation dataset. Finally, we combined the new-cropland proportion, IDI and hydroclimatic water constraint into a 1 km Cropland Expansion Water-Resource Indicator (CEWRI). Cropland area increased from 58,823.5 km2 in 2015 to 78,184.2 km2 in 2024, a net increase of 32.91%, and most new cropland was located along the margins of existing oases. After conversion, the OCE of newly cultivated land increased by 2.93°C on average. IDI was positively correlated with independently mapped irrigation: Spearman’s ρ increased from 0.463 at the 1 km scale to 0.786 after aggregation to 20 km blocks. Its ability to distinguish irrigated from non-irrigated cells in 2019 was moderate (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC = 0.701). The high and very high CEWRI classes contained 57.64% of the persistent new-cropland area. This result indicates that expansion-related water-resource pressure was concentrated where cropland expansion, irrigation-associated thermal response and water constraint occurred together. The framework is a regional screening tool: it identifies priority areas where irrigation withdrawals and hydrological risk should be assessed in more detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: