Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study examines how Cubist principles – modularity, abstraction and multiple perspectives – relate to innovation in manufacturing systems. It identifies factors associated with innovation, organizational challenges and approaches for strengthening innovation capabilities. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods design combined quantitative and qualitative analyses with machine-learning techniques. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire comprising closed- and open-ended questions from employees across manufacturing roles. Quantitative analysis included demographic analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), structural equation modeling (SEM) and machine-learning models, including neural networks and random forests. Qualitative analysis involved text preprocessing, word-frequency analysis, sentiment analysis and latent dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling. The results were integrated to provide a comprehensive understanding of innovation in manufacturing systems. Findings Modularity, abstraction and multiple perspectives were significantly associated with innovation, with multiple perspectives showing the strongest association (path coefficient = 0.52). Random forest and neural network models demonstrated strong predictive performance (R2 > 0.80). Qualitative findings highlighted resistance to change and resource constraints as key challenges, while advanced tools and cross-departmental collaboration emerged as potential solutions. Sentiment analysis showed a predominantly positive outlook (56.25% positive responses). Research limitations/implications Manufacturing organizations may strengthen innovation by promoting modular design, investing in AI and 3D modeling, fostering cross-departmental collaboration, addressing resource constraints and resistance to change and providing employee training. Originality/value This study contributes by integrating Cubist principles with manufacturing innovation through a mixed-methods approach that combines statistical rigor, machine-learning prediction and qualitative insights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jahanyan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: