Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Digital technologies are widely assumed to democratize citizen participation, yet their actual effects on co-production remain theoretically underspecified. This study examines how digital technologies shape co-production through a qualitative analysis of Taiwan’s Street Doctor Improvement Program—a national-level digital co-production initiative for pedestrian safety. The findings challenge prevailing assumptions in the digital governance literature and lead to three theoretical modifications. First, digital platforms exhibit a dual nature—empowering citizens through lowered participation barriers while enabling governmental control through agenda-setting and data ownership. Second, effective digital co-production depends on dynamic institutional work; Taiwan’s full government funding mechanism and citizen voting system demonstrate how policy actors innovate beyond existing institutional constraints. Third, public value creation proves culturally contextualized rather than universal; participation took the form of organized platform appropriation, as neighborhood representatives and other organized actors mobilized and contested it in ways that challenge individual-centered accounts of digital co-production. By integrating co-production theory, public service ecosystem perspectives, and institutional work concepts, this study advances digital governance scholarship beyond single-level analyses toward a multi-actor, multi-level framework. The findings offer practical guidance for designing culturally sensitive digital governance and inform the debate over whether digital participation creates genuine public value or merely symbolic inclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huan-Sheng Lin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: