Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Port-Hamiltonian models describe physical systems by separating stored energy, dissipation and external inputs. Learning such models from data requires a choice of representation and fitting method. We compare using neural networks, analytic expressions and combinations of the two for representing the different components of the port-Hamiltonian system, and compare fitting the models with gradient-based optimisation or sparse regression. Testing on simulations of mechanical and electrical systems, with and without added noise, we present prediction accuracy and computational cost of the different approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eidnes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: