Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tobacco initiation often occurs early in life, yet evidence on school-based prevention for children remains fragmented. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined randomized controlled trials of school-based smoking prevention interventions initiated among children aged 6–12 years, evaluating smoking initiation and knowledge. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched without date restrictions. The review followed PRISMA2020 and was registered (PROSPERO: CRD420251090900). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2, and results were pooled with heterogeneity quantified using I². Thirty-two studies were included, predominantly involving children aged 10–12 years from different countries. Most studies reporting sex distribution included approximately 45–55% female participants. Seven studies contributed to the meta-analysis of smoking initiation. The pooled estimate indicated lower odds of smoking initiation among intervention participants (OR = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.70–0.94; p = 0.007; I²=30.96%). Knowledge outcomes were not meta-analysed due to heterogeneity, although interactive and skills-based programmes showed more consistent improvements than information-focused approaches. Overall, the findings suggest that school-based programmes initiated during childhood may modestly reduce smoking initiation, supporting the relevance of preventive efforts before smoking behaviours become established in adolescence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gianfredi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: