Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frontier large language models (LLMs) depend on energy-intensive cloud data centers and continuous connectivity that many low-resource healthcare settings lack. This paper investigates whether Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning combined with 4-bit GGUF quantization enables accurate medical question answering (QA) on commodity CPUs without GPU acceleration or cloud connectivity. We instantiate this pipeline as MediLITE-QA, a fine-tuned Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (3.8B-parameter) model. On a consumer-laptop CPU, the deployed model reaches a steady-state Time to First Token of 1.34 s, 8.19 tokens/second, and 71.87% average accuracy across nine medical QA benchmarks (72.79% before quantization, not significantly different from the 8B model OpenBioLLM-8B). The 7–8B comparison models used 1.56–1.98× more CPU energy per token and showed cold-start penalties that MediLITE-QA did not. Fine-tuning GPU-board energy, estimated from power telemetry, was approximately 139 kWh. In an exploratory blinded clinical evaluation, the fine-tuned model was not significantly better than its base model and remained significantly below a frontier cloud reference (Wilcoxon padj=0.0023, n=100). On this hardware tier, the pipeline is a viable, lower-energy-per-token alternative to larger models, relevant to Sustainable Development Goals 3, 9, and 10; results should not be assumed to transfer to phones, single-board computers, or servers, and accuracy gaps must close before clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odewole et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: