Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rainfall variability, recurrent dry spells, and limited soil-water storage constrain rainfed maize and sorghum production in sub-Saharan Africa. Tied ridging and mulching are widely promoted as low-cost soil and water conservation practices. However, their effects on soil moisture, grain yield and water productivity (WP) vary across crops and environments. This meta-analysis synthesized evidence from 101 peer-reviewed studies on tied ridging and mulching in rainfed maize and sorghum systems across sub-Saharan Africa. Treatment-control comparisons were analysed using bias-corrected standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) under random-effects models, with subgroup analyses by rainfall class, soil type, and region. Tied ridging significantly increased soil moisture in maize (g = 2.115; 95% CI: 1.508–2.722) and sorghum (g = 1.965; 95% CI: 1.379–2.551), with negligible heterogeneity. It also increased grain yield in maize (g = 1.159; 95% CI: 0.556–1.762) and sorghum (g = 1.193; 95% CI: 0.716–1.670), although maize yield responses were heterogeneous. Mulching significantly improved soil moisture in maize (g = 1.441; 95% CI: 1.139–1.744) and sorghum (g = 2.209; 95% CI: 1.282–3.136), and increased grain yield in maize (g = 1.809; 95% CI: 1.399–2.220) and sorghum (g = 1.850; 95% CI: 0.819–2.880). Water productivity evidence was limited, but mulching significantly improved maize WP (g = 1.977; 95% CI: 1.278–2.676), whereas tied ridging had no effect. Both practices enhance soil-water retention and productivity, but recommendations should be targeted by rainfall regime, soil type, crop, and local management constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kibet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: