Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is an association between frequent Accident and Emergency (A&E) hospital attendances—high-intensity service use—and contact with the justice system. This paper addresses the lack of evidence regarding the scale and nature of high-intensity service use in a prison context, including while people are in prison and before and after prison. Using 2023/24 Emergency Care Data, we looked at A&E attendances for 16,384 people in prison in England. While in prison, 698 people (4.3%) attended A&E five or more times over a year, meeting the criteria for high-intensity service use, with attendances commonly due to chest pain, seizure or self-injurious behaviour. A total of 5227 people (32%) attended A&E in and out of prison in the same year, with nearly 1 in 4 (n = 1282) attending five or more times outside of prison. There is a need for mechanisms to enable identification and support for high-intensity service use in a prison context. This may include facilitating data linkage, developing prison-specific services and/or enabling routes of access for community services to operate within prisons. Effective management of high-intensity use in a prison context would have the dual benefits of reducing inappropriate use of urgent care services both in and out of prison.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davies et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: