Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We formulate the global trace condition, GTC, for cyclic proofs as a particular case of the size-change termination condition, or SCT. We express cyclic proofs through a variant of size-change graphs, called transition graphs, whose edges are labelled by (finite) bipartite relations. We show that injective transition graphs suffice to encode cyclic pre-proofs for a variant of Brotherston and Simpson's sequent calculus with inductive definitions. The injectivity of transition graphs corresponds to restricting SCT to fan-in-free graphs. Then we prove that an essentially weaker condition implies SCT in this case, and hence GTC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berardi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: