Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper develops a non-parametric test statistic for assessing the equality of the health concentration curve and the 45-degree line, which represents perfect equality. Specifically, the test compares the health concentration curve, C(p,Y), with the line p for p∈(0,1) using an L2 metric. In addition, we propose alternative tests for detecting pro-rich and pro-poor health inequalities based on metrics other than L2. We employ a non-parametric estimator for C(p,Y) and establish the asymptotic properties of the tests, including their size and power. A Monte Carlo simulation study demonstrates the strong finite-sample performance of the tests, with robust size and power across various data-generating processes. Finally, to illustrate the practical relevance of the proposed methods, we apply them to U.S. data to test for inequality in COVID-19 deaths across and within U.S. states, comparing the health concentration curves of these outcomes to the 45-degree line. Our empirical findings reveal varying levels of health inequality across states, with some states showing pro-rich inequality where wealthier individuals experience lower death rates. The results highlight the critical role of socioeconomic disparities in shaping the impact of COVID-19, particularly in states with high poverty rates and lower incomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouezmarni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: