Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mine microseismic signals are characterized by short duration, strong non-stationarity, and pronounced transient behavior. The principal event wave train and broadband random noise often overlap in both the time and frequency domains, making it difficult for conventional fixed-band filtering or single-threshold methods to simultaneously suppress noise and preserve waveform structure. This study proposes an adaptive denoising method integrating spectral-kurtosis–energy band identification, the Fourier synchrosqueezing transform dominant-ridge tracking, and frequency-row-wise Stein’s unbiased risk estimate (SURE) thresholding. The field example is an eight-channel transient record acquired by an underground ARAMIS M/E microseismic network during a controlled destressing blast; it is used as a reproducible field-source waveform rather than as an independent population of spontaneous microseismic events. For channel T3, the dominant frequency remains 63.96 Hz after denoising, background RMS decreases by 29.54%, the event-window correlation coefficient is 0.9937, and the energy-retention ratio is 98.10%. A corrected five-variant ablation experiment is then performed on 100 field-noise-driven resampled signals at input SNRs of −10, −5, 0, 5, and 10 dB. The proposed SK-FSST-SURE variant yields an average output SNR of 10.32 ± 7.40 dB, root-mean-square error of 0.184 ± 0.165, correlation coefficient of 0.895 ± 0.134, and relative energy error of 28.06% ± 56.09%. The SURE-based variants are numerically close, showing that spectral-kurtosis and ridge constraints do not provide a universal gain in global SNR; instead, they modify the trade-off among noise suppression, onset protection, and energy preservation. Independent analytic-reference tests and parameter perturbations further show that performance is stable over a practical range of ridge and time-frequency parameters, while overlap ratio produces a measurable SNR–energy-preservation trade-off. The conclusions are therefore restricted to the tested waveform families, noise conditions, and acquisition environment, and cross-event or cross-mine generalization requires independent field validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: