Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quality factor Q is a fundamental physical parameter for subsurface media, quantifying the absorption attenuation of seismic waves. Accurate Q estimation and full-space Q field construction are essential for enhancing seismic imaging resolution. A complete workflow for Q estimation and full-space Q field construction is developed. First, a near-surface Q estimation method using single-uphole survey data is presented. The effects of inconsistent seismic wavelets and variable geophone coupling on Q estimation are suppressed through multiple spectral ratios. Second, a medium-deep Q estimation method using common midpoint (CMP) gathers is developed. The method exploits attenuation differences among traces with different offsets and avoids explicit wavelet estimation, normal moveout (NMO) correction, and along-layer traveltime picking. Third, the estimated Q values are converted into absorption coefficients, which are fitted and then converted back to Q values to reduce local fluctuations caused by noise and other interference. Fourth, a prediction framework based on long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks is proposed to reconstruct the missing interval between the near-surface and medium-deep Q fields. Validation with known Q values demonstrates that absorption coefficients provide more stable predictions than layer Q and equivalent Q, while the proposed LSTM strategy achieves higher prediction accuracy than conventional spline interpolation. Field seismic tests demonstrate the reliability of the proposed workflow for near-surface and medium-deep Q estimation and full-space Q field construction. After inverse-Q compensation using the constructed Q field, reflection continuity and weak deep reflections are improved, and the frequency within the analyzed window increases by 13 Hz.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaofeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: