Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unsupervised detection of bridge damages from vehicle-induced vibration is complicated by passage-to-passage variability and scarce damage labels. This study proposes a distribution-based framework using acceleration from one mid-span accelerometer, with vehicle entry/exit times and speed additionally required for event extraction and spatial alignment. For each passage, a dual-branch Conv–LSTM–attention autoencoder trained only on healthy data jointly encodes the spatially aligned time-domain response and the passage-level FFT magnitude spectrum. This fusion combines transient/local response information with global spectral characteristics. Frequency-domain reconstruction errors from multiple passages are treated as an empirical distribution, whose deviation from a healthy reference is quantified by the second-order Wasserstein distance. The framework is evaluated on a full-scale laboratory bridge under controlled but variable vehicle passages, with condition changes introduced by guardrail removal, and on a calibrated vehicle–bridge finite-element model with localized stiffness reductions. Compared with the frequency-only model examined herein, the fused model provides clearer separation between baseline and altered states. For the investigated cases, the index increases monotonically with imposed change severity, shows location-dependent sensitivity, and becomes less variable as passages accumulate, with approximate stabilization at 200–260 passages. The results support the feasibility of detecting global bridge condition changes using one bridge-mounted accelerometer plus auxiliary passage information, but do not establish damage localization or generalization to operational traffic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: