Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose To develop and internally validate two pre- and post-MRI prediction models (COR-PM1 and COR-PM2) and evaluate a sequential risk-stratified pathway (COR-RSP) for reducing MRI examinations and prostate biopsies during the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Methods COR-PM1 and COR-PM2 were developed using logistic regression in 943 men who underwent MRI and biopsy (2016–2023). COR-PM1 incorporated age, serum PSA, DRE findings, prior negative biopsy, and qualitative DRE-derived prostate volume (PV). COR-PM2 incorporated PI-RADS score, with MRI-PV instead of DRE-PV. Calibration, discrimination, net benefit, and clinical performance were assessed after correction by optimism. COR-RSP sequentially applied both models at thresholds corresponding to 95% sensitivity. Results CsPCa was detected in 501 men (53.1%). Optimism-corrected AUC were 0.765 (95% CI 0.737–0.796) for COR-PM and 0.819 (95% CI 0.793–0.845) for COR-PM 2 (p = 0.001). Both models showed good calibration and net benefit. At 95% sensitivity thresholds, COR-PM1 could have avoided 139 MRI examinations (14.7%), whereas COR-PM2 could have avoided 180 biopsies (19.1%), particularly among men with PI-RADS ≤ 3. COR-RSP could have avoided 139 MRI examinations (14.7%), and 240 biopsies (25.5%), while missing 40 csPCa missed (8.0%). Biopsy yield could have increased from 53.1% to 65.6%. Conclusions COR-PM1 and COR-PM2 may help predict csPCa risk before and after MRI. COR-RSP may reduce MRI use and biopsies while increasing biopsy yield, although some csPCa cases may be missed. External validation is needed to confirm its clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Recio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: