Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally evaluate explainable machine-learning classifiers for physician-diagnosed childhood asthma status and assess the incremental value of five complete-blood-count (CBC)-derived inflammatory indices beyond gender, race, age, family history of asthma, poverty income ratio (PIR), and body mass index (BMI). METHODS: NHANES 2007-2016 data from 6,437 children aged 2-14 years were split into training (n = 4,505) and held-out test (n = 1,932) sets. Six machine-learning algorithms were compared using PR-AUC as the primary selection metric. Calibration and the classification threshold were derived from training out-of-fold predictions. The final model was evaluated in the held-out test set. KernelSHAP assessed feature contributions, and repeated nested cross-validation evaluated the incremental value of the five CBC-derived indices. RESULTS: Among 6,437 children, 784 (12.2%) had physician-diagnosed asthma. SVM achieved the highest mean PR-AUC (0.294) during training-set repeated cross-validation and ranked first in all 10 repeats. In the held-out test set, ROC-AUC was 0.743 (95% CI, 0.708-0.778) and PR-AUC was 0.312 (95% CI, 0.268-0.370). At the training-derived threshold of 0.081, sensitivity was 0.672, specificity 0.740, and Brier score 0.097. Family history of asthma had the largest mean absolute SHAP value (0.089). Adding the five CBC-derived indices changed mean PR-AUC from 0.2944 to 0.2956 (paired difference +0.0012; SD 0.0049). CONCLUSION: The SVM showed moderate discrimination for physician-diagnosed childhood asthma status. CBC-derived inflammatory indices provided no clear incremental improvement beyond gender, race, age, family history, PIR, and BMI. External validation is required before clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuting Zheng (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: