Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To compare the postoperative pain outcomes of bilateral US-guided TAP block versus LA wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Dr, Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. Period: Six months April 21, 2022, to October 21, 2022. Methods: Two groups of sixty patients were randomly assigned based on their fulfilment of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quantitative & qualitative data were collected, presented, and analyzed using SPSS. Statistical significance was determined using post-stratification chi-square and independent t-tests, with a p-value of less than or equal to 0.05. Results: In Group T, which received TAP blocks, the average pain score is 4.38 ± 2.35, but in Group L, which received LA blocks, it was 6.4 ± 2.58 (p = 0.001). Mean analgesic consumption was 6.89 ± 3.87 mg in Group T versus 9.78 ± 4.78 mg in Section L (p = 0.001). Group T's mean duration of analgesia (515.9 ± 150.41 min) was noticeably greater than Group L's mean duration (290.7 ± 67.03 min) (p = 0.001). Conclusion: After surgery, bilateral US-guided TAP blocks offer better pain management & longer analgesic duration than LA wound infiltration. On the other hand, LA is still easier to get and cheaper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: