Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Given a static image and a selected person, general gaze following predicts the person’s likely gaze target. Ambiguous head cues can leave several geometrically plausible targets. We develop a scene-conditioned localization framework that retains directional uncertainty instead of collapsing it into one gaze direction. Building on a fixed, previously published geometry-guided reference, Distribution-Guided Query Interaction (DGQI) refines direction–distance candidates using scene evidence, the Distribution-Conditioned Localization Decoder (DCLD) adjusts the reference heatmap through residual prediction, and Selective Teacher-Margin Ranking Preservation (STMRP) protects selected correct spatial rankings during training. On the GazeFollow official test set, the final model reaches a pooled/global AUC of 0.9190, an original-resolution per-image AUC of 0.9342, and a normalized distance error of 0.1289 compared to the published baseline values of 0.9066, 0.9214, and 0.1423, respectively. Within-reference controls distinguish module effects from cross-generation changes in the scene backbone. DCLD yields the clearest localization gains; DGQI contributes a smaller discrimination gain; and STMRP improves per-image AUC at a localization cost. This separation has revealed that discrimination and peak localization need not improve together. Zero-shot experiments on VideoAttentionTarget and a coverage-limited ChildPlay subset expose further domain sensitivity. These results motivate protocol-aware, multi-metric evaluation of gaze predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: