Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study Design Prospective cohort. Objective The primary objective was to describe bowel and bladder (BB) function by nerve root sacrifice following a Sacrectomy. Secondary objectives were to compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) based on BB function at 12 months, and to assess surgeon–patient reported BB function concordance. Methods Data from AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON) registry included patients who underwent a sacrectomy (S1–S5) for a primary bone tumor, with at least one PRO reported at baseline and 12 months. BB function was recorded at baseline and 12 months. PROs included EQ-5D, SOSGOQv2.0, SF-36, leg/back NRS, ECOG. Results Eighty-one patients were included. Bilateral S1–S2 sacrifice was associated with complete BB dysfunction; preservation of at least one S3 root was associated with preserved BB function in more than half of cases. Distal S4–S5 resections often preserved function, but about one-third had BB dysfunction. Agreement between surgeon–patient reported BB function was moderate (κ 0.39–0.45). At 12 months, patients with preserved BB function reported higher EQ-5D (0.70 vs 0.60, p=0.025) and SOSGOQv2.0 (83.5 vs 67.5, p=0.031), better ECOG (p= 0.028) and lower leg pain (0.5 vs 4.5, p=0.013). Conclusion A substantial proportion of patients experience BB dysfunction after sacrectomy, particularly with more cranial resections. This dysfunction aligned with worse PROs, greater pain, and poorer performance status. Agreement between surgeon- and patient-reported BB outcomes was moderate, emphasizing the importance of incorporating patient-reported measures into follow-up and counseling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ludwig et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: