This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
There is growing interest in lifestyle-based strategies supporting postmenopausal women’s psychological well-being and physiological resilience. Because evidence regarding natural environments remains scarce for this demographic, this study examined acute psychophysiological responses to 60-minute walking sessions in forest versus urban contexts. Twenty-four physically inactive postmenopausal women (≥50 years) completed a within-subject trial. Assessments included psychological questionnaires, heart rate variability (HRV), mucosal immune biomarkers (salivary immunoglobulin A [SIgA], lactoferrin, α-amylase), and stress markers (cortisol, nitric oxide [NO], cell-free mitochondrial DNA [cf-mtDNA]) measured pre- and post-session. Forest walking elicited higher high-frequency (HF) power, a lower LF/HF ratio, and greater increases in the SIgA/total protein ratio (p < 0.001) compared to urban walking. Furthermore, the forest condition yielded significantly greater psychological improvements and reduced negative moods, including anger (p = 0.002) and fatigue (p = 0.010). Reductions in cortisol, cf-mtDNA, and NO showed significant condition × time interaction effects. Additionally, an overnight forest stay significantly enhanced baseline SIgA and happiness while reducing stress markers. In conclusion, forest-based walking interventions elicit more favorable physiological and psychological responses than urban park walking. By enhancing parasympathetic activation, immune function, and psychological well-being, forest walking serves as a practical, evidence-based strategy to promote holistic health in postmenopausal women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: