Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Waning vaccine-induced immunity and the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants have prompted the evaluation of alternative booster strategies. We investigated the systemic immune profiles associated with three second-booster regimens in adults previously vaccinated with three doses of an inactivated vaccine. Methods: This exploratory analysis was nested within a randomized phase IV trial comparing homologous CoronaVac (ICV), intramuscular Ad5-nCoV (IM), and inhaled Ad5-nCoV (IH) boosting. Serum antibody responses were assessed, 119 plasma samples underwent Olink inflammatory-protein profiling, and 24 peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples were analyzed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Results: At Day 14, wild-type SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers were 880.8, 297.6, and 77.3 in the IM, IH, and ICV groups, respectively. Seven inflammatory proteins were upregulated in both Ad5-nCoV groups, and several were positively associated with antibody responses. In the small scRNA-seq subset, the IH group showed a higher observed peripheral CD8+ T cell proportion than the IM and ICV groups, together with antigen presentation- and cytotoxicity-related transcriptional patterns; neither vaccine-specific lymphocyte responses nor cellular function was directly measured. Conclusions: The three booster regimens were associated with distinct Day 14 humoral, inflammatory protein, and peripheral immune cell profiles. These hypothesis-generating observations complement the immunogenicity findings of the parent trial but do not establish a causal mechanism or identify a clinically preferred booster regimen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: