Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thermosetting networks retain a structural memory of how they were cured. Cure temperature, diffusion, and catalyst loading are recognized levers on the gel point; catalyst spatial distribution at a fixed loading has received less attention. We introduce a catalyst-centered domain (CCD) construction that precures a separate domain around each Zn catalyst before assembly, applied to bisphenol A dicyanate ester (BADCy) curing. At matched loading and chemistry, five replicas per protocol give mean gel-point conversions of 51.5 ± 4.5% for CCD curing and 44.3 ± 5.3% for conventional single-cell curing, providing suggestive evidence of delayed gelation. Raw simulated Tg values are 629 ± 39 K and 567 ± 13 K, respectively; agreement of the CCD estimate with experiment is obtained only under the selected WLF extrapolation. Local structure matches at conversion, while the giant cluster diverges globally: the CCD giant is smaller, spectrally better-connected, and near-spherical, whereas the conventional giant is a larger, rod-like spanning cluster. Reaction-population analysis shows that inter-cluster reactions dominate the analyzed curing stages. These results link the compared network-construction protocols to differences in gelation behavior and network topology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: