Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The concrete support structure beneath a bottom-dismantled turbine stay ring is a geometrically complex load-bearing region in hydropower powerhouses. Large maintenance openings, variable section thickness, and interaction among the stay ring, spiral case, and surrounding concrete produce three-dimensional load transfer that conventional member-based calculations struggle to represent. This study compares simplified structural calculations and three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) for reinforcement design. In the simplified approach, the spatial concrete structure is idealized as planar frames, cantilever corbels, and fixed-end beams, and reinforcement is determined from sectional internal forces according to hydraulic concrete design provisions. A three-dimensional solid model is established in ANSYS, and reinforcement demand is evaluated using an elastic tensile-stress-region approach. For the stay-ring corbel, the simplified calculation gives a required reinforcement of 4926 mm2/m, whereas the FEA-based tensile-stress-region assessment gives 3079 mm2/m, corresponding to a reduction of about 37% relative to the simplified result. For the maintenance-gallery roof slab, the simplified calculation gives 4908 mm2/m, whereas the FEA-based assessment gives 3273 mm2/m, corresponding to a reduction of about 33% relative to the simplified result. These differences are mainly attributed to spatial restraint and load redistribution in the three-dimensional model. In practical design, the simplified calculation provides a transparent, code-based baseline for load-path definition and sectional reinforcement design, whereas the 3D FEA provides spatially resolved tensile-demand information for checking and refining reinforcement in geometrically disturbed regions; the two methods are therefore complementary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: