Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study fabricated alternating hydrophobic–hydrophilic micropatterned surfaces using photolithography, chemical vapor deposition, and reactive ion etching. Hydrophilic regions were flat SiO₂, while hydrophobic square patterns (10 and 40 µm) were prepared via (i) perfluorinated low-surface-energy self-assembled monolayers (SiO₂-FT-SAM), (ii) RIE-induced roughening (SiO₂/SiO₂*), and (iii) combined roughness and SAM modification (SiO₂/SiO₂*-FT-SAM). Wettability was evaluated at hydrophobic area fractions of 25%, 50%, and 75%. At 40 µm feature size and 75% coverage, the hybrid surface achieved a static contact angle of 138°, indicating a stable Cassie state with a trapped air layer. The observed reversibility of the air film further supports the synergistic roles of micro-roughness and low surface energy. Overall, this approach enables effective wettability control and supports the development of self-cleaning, low-adhesion surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: