Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates how natural-resource value, socioeconomic activity, and spatial morphology interact at the grid scale in Shanghai, with particular attention to functional differentiation, non-linear transitions, and spatial heterogeneity. Multi-source data were harmonised to a 400 m grid, and composite indicators were constructed through factor analysis and aggregation of normalised indicators. Natural-break classification, unsupervised machine-learning clustering, and Lee’s L analysis identified spatial patterns, whilst bidirectional XGBoost models interpreted with SHAP examined relationships between natural-resource value and socioeconomic activity. Aggregate activity and ground coverage show the strongest negative associations with natural-resource value, but technology and public services remain positively associated with natural-resource value, with parallel tendencies for culture, tourism, and finance. The associations of young-worker concentration and building height with natural-resource value are U-shaped. Gas and hydrological regulation shift from positive to negative associations with socioeconomic activity as provision intensifies, distinguishing ecological landscapes embedded in the built-up area from regional ecological service systems. The three-way coupling is asymmetric, non-linear, and spatially differentiated. Its planning significance lies in distinguishing land-intensive growth from knowledge- and service-oriented renewal, and urban ecological landscapes from regional ecological service systems. Super-large and mega cities should therefore coordinate load and land-occupation control, functional and vertical renewal, and the distinct urban and regional roles of ecological resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: