Key result
Waist-to-height ratio identifies ~5 percentage points more adults with cardiometabolic risk than BMI.
Why the study?
How do waist-to-height ratio and waist-to-hip ratio correlate with body mass index and classify cardiometabolic risk in an adult primary care population?
Cross-Sectional (n=406)
Yes
How do waist-to-height ratio and waist-to-hip ratio correlate with body mass index and classify cardiometabolic risk in an adult primary care population?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Waist-to-height ratio tracks closely with BMI while identifying a slightly higher proportion of primary care adults at increased cardiometabolic risk, whereas waist-to-hip ratio captures a distinct dimension of body shape.
Background Body mass index (BMI) does not describe fat distribution. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) may provide complementary information about central adiposity in primary care. Objective To compare the distributions and pairwise correlations of BMI, WHtR, and WHR and to describe the prevalence of dyslipidemia and hypertension in an adult primary care cohort. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled adults from two family medicine clinics affiliated with St. John Hospital and Medical Center in Detroit, Michigan. Standardized anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, and fasting laboratory values were obtained. Analyses used complete cases and included descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations among the three anthropometric indices. Results Of 467 enrolled participants, 406 (86.9%) had complete data. The mean (SD) age was 50.1 (16.0) years; 193 (47.5%) were men and 213 (52.5%) were women. Mean (SD) BMI was 30.1 (6.9) kg/m2, WHtR was 0.61 (0.08), and WHR was 0.95 (0.09). Hypertension was present in 160 participants (39.4%) and dyslipidemia in 177 (43.6%). BMI and WHtR were strongly correlated (r = 0.893, p < 0.001); WHtR and WHR were moderately correlated (r = 0.346, p < 0.001); and BMI and WHR were weakly correlated (r = 0.156, p < 0.05). A WHtR threshold of 0.50 classified 57.6% of participants as having increased cardiometabolic risk, compared with 52.7% classified as obese by BMI. Conclusion The three anthropometric indices were not interchangeable. WHtR tracked closely with BMI but produced a modestly higher screening yield, whereas WHR captured a less closely correlated dimension of body shape. WHtR may be a practical complement to BMI in primary care; outcome-specific regression or discrimination analyses are required before claiming predictive superiority for dyslipidemia or hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekole et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Adult primary care population evaluated for central adiposity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (n=406). Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) vs. Body mass index (BMI) was evaluated on Distributions and pairwise Pearson correlations of BMI, WHtR, and WHR, and screening yield for cardiometabolic risk (r = 0.893 (BMI and WHtR), p=< 0.001). Waist-to-height ratio correlated strongly with BMI (r=0.893, p<0.001) and classified 57.6% of adults as having increased cardiometabolic risk vs 52.7% classified as obese by BMI.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: