Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Music offers a stringent test of embodied intelligence because performance couples precise timing, morphology-dependent sound production, action-conditioned perception and interpersonal coordination. We conducted a systematic mapping survey with a piano-priority mechanism sample. Source screening retained 12,175 version-merged records, thematic screening retained 1944 and task-context screening advanced 831. Abstract and selected-method assessment advanced 241 technically relevant records, from which 96 research papers were selected for full-text coding. We propose three operational tests, a five-axis taxonomy and a separate L0–L4 ladder. The 96 independent full-text coder pairs yielded linear-weighted Cohen’s κ=0.939 for sensorimotor closure and κ=0.958 for embodiment level. Among 62 physical musical papers, 20 reported task-level acoustic feedback, 18 numerical system/component delay and 38 hardware limitation, failure or recovery; none of nine socially interactive physical papers separately quantified both influence directions. These are descriptive reporting frequencies in a purposive piano-priority sample and do not estimate field-wide prevalence. Forty-eight contextual references support definitions and transfer interpretation outside core denominators. The symmetry-aware synthesis separates geometric invariance/equivariance from directional partner influence and morphology-dependent action constraints. It supplies falsifiable propositions and proposed tests, rather than symmetry-coded prevalence results or new robot experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: