Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol (TC/HDL-C ratio) are two readily available lipid indices, but their comparative associations with incident ischemic heart disease (IHD) have rarely been examined directly in nondiabetic Asian populations. Methods: This study followed 14,728 nondiabetic Korean adults from the HERAS-HIRA cohort for a mean of 2.2 ± 1.1 years (median: 2.3 years), with participants grouped into quartiles of each index. Hazard ratios (HRs) for incident IHD were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: During follow-up, IHD occurred in 271 participants (1.8%). Compared with the lowest quartile, the highest quartile was associated with a higher adjusted risk of IHD for both the TC/HDL-C ratio (HR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.70–4.65) and non-HDL-C (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.13–2.69). In marker-only, unadjusted ROC analysis, the TC/HDL-C ratio had a slightly higher AUC than non-HDL-C did (0.628 vs. 0.600, p = 0.023), although both values indicated modest dis-crimination; the exploratory, sample-derived cutoffs were 3.6 and 142 mg/dL, respectively. Conclusions: Both indices were associated with incident IHD, but the TC/HDL-C ratio showed only slightly better unadjusted discrimination; adjusted time-to-event prediction analyses and external validation are needed before additional clinical utility can be inferred.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: