Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examine the wealth effects of 3 regulatory changes designed to improve minority-shareholder protection in the Chinese stock markets. Using the value of a firm’s related-party transactions as an inverse proxy for the quality of corporate governance, wefind that firms with weaker governance experienced significantly larger abnormal returns around announcements of the new regulations than did firms with stronger governance. We also find that firms with strong ties to the government did not benefit from the regulations, suggesting that minority shareholders did not expect regulators to enforce the new rules on firms where blockholders have strong political connections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berkman et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: